Debunking claims from the article “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” argument that COVID-19 definitely wasn’t engineered in a lab way back in March 2020
Thanks for reminding us once again about all the gaslighting by Anderson and cronies. How come we never see Baric up there testifying to what he did for WIV? The coverup is so obvious it makes me nauseous.
@Dan - long-time reader/subscriber. Thanks for this “reprint” of your work.
Can you help me understand what your current view of the threat/risk from the COVID-19 (mutated) virus(es) now in circulation? In this paper you had suggested that the Chinese feared ADE in their population; I think trying to explain their Wuhan lockdown? However, the successive waves do seem to have moderated virulence and IFR. I’ve read that you warn of a reversion of LAV to virulence. In another recent entry you seemed resigned to a future resurgence of infection. Is that still your view?
In summary, if I’ve understand your teaching, it is in summary: (1) lab engineered LAV, (2) method using serial passage (ferret or shrew), (3) hypothesis of intent was as Red Team in vaccine development, (4) accidental release from sloppy BSL-4 lab.
(Add to that massive coverup of US involvement from Baric-based-work, NIH funding, et.c. Add to that opportunistic suppression of EUA-cancelling OTS medications to push MRNA human trial and Pharma cash grab.)
Would you share what you see, today, as likely future risk from this virus?
Observation of the behavior of the rulers of various regions of the globe (US, Europe, China) in the last few years strongly suggests they act in a coordinated manner, even when those actions are against the interests of the country and the people they are supposed to represent.
In this particular case, the emergence of a virus that was not really dangerous in its non-recombined form admirably served the goal of training populations for obedience, introducing laws and precedents that severely curtailed freedom, enriching hand-picked political clients, and purging from the state apparatus those who would not obey directives that were harmful to themselves and the country.
From the point of view of our rulers, it was a great success. For the small price of the lives of those who had severe side effects for the prophylactic gene therapy, they now have the certainty that those left in the state apparatus will implement any unconstitutional orders, without thinking. They did it once, so they will do it again. Cowards fold when pressed.
Nov 4, 2023·edited Nov 4, 2023Liked by Harvard2TheBigHouse
Really great to see this again. As the other co-author, I continue to be impressed with both your writing and insights. Still waiting for justice for the conspiracy that did its best silence discussion and hide our work.
Thanks for reminding us once again about all the gaslighting by Anderson and cronies. How come we never see Baric up there testifying to what he did for WIV? The coverup is so obvious it makes me nauseous.
@Dan - long-time reader/subscriber. Thanks for this “reprint” of your work.
Can you help me understand what your current view of the threat/risk from the COVID-19 (mutated) virus(es) now in circulation? In this paper you had suggested that the Chinese feared ADE in their population; I think trying to explain their Wuhan lockdown? However, the successive waves do seem to have moderated virulence and IFR. I’ve read that you warn of a reversion of LAV to virulence. In another recent entry you seemed resigned to a future resurgence of infection. Is that still your view?
In summary, if I’ve understand your teaching, it is in summary: (1) lab engineered LAV, (2) method using serial passage (ferret or shrew), (3) hypothesis of intent was as Red Team in vaccine development, (4) accidental release from sloppy BSL-4 lab.
(Add to that massive coverup of US involvement from Baric-based-work, NIH funding, et.c. Add to that opportunistic suppression of EUA-cancelling OTS medications to push MRNA human trial and Pharma cash grab.)
Would you share what you see, today, as likely future risk from this virus?
Observation of the behavior of the rulers of various regions of the globe (US, Europe, China) in the last few years strongly suggests they act in a coordinated manner, even when those actions are against the interests of the country and the people they are supposed to represent.
In this particular case, the emergence of a virus that was not really dangerous in its non-recombined form admirably served the goal of training populations for obedience, introducing laws and precedents that severely curtailed freedom, enriching hand-picked political clients, and purging from the state apparatus those who would not obey directives that were harmful to themselves and the country.
From the point of view of our rulers, it was a great success. For the small price of the lives of those who had severe side effects for the prophylactic gene therapy, they now have the certainty that those left in the state apparatus will implement any unconstitutional orders, without thinking. They did it once, so they will do it again. Cowards fold when pressed.
"The fuck it hasn't." LOL
Really great to see this again. As the other co-author, I continue to be impressed with both your writing and insights. Still waiting for justice for the conspiracy that did its best silence discussion and hide our work.
Did you read the not yet peer reviewed paper connecting HIV with the covid virus and injections? You were the very first to note this back in 2020…
Just noticed you're suspended from twitter/X! Are you appealing? Or do you have another account we can access?